[Fwd: Re: [Z-Push-dev] Nokia N900 and Z-push 1.3 RC]

Thorsten Schnebeck thorsten.schnebeck at gmx.net
Sat Apr 24 02:01:46 CEST 2010


Am Freitag 23 April 2010 23:45:17 schrieben Sie:
> hi Thorsten
> 
> see the attached message
> Alain,
>
>  Von: Sebastian Kummer <s.kummer at zarafaserver.com.br>
> > I would say it's related to the provisioning which was introduced in 1.3.
> > I'm not sure if the N900 supports it as until today I had no device "in hands" for testing.
> > 
> > Try enabling the loose-provisioning (z-push config). If that also does not help, disable provisioning completely
> > (parameter provisioning).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Sebastian
> > 
> > PS. Any hints in the debug log?

> 
> Regards
> 
Hi Alain,

from the N900-MfE Wiki:
> Known issues
> Provisioning
> N900 is considered to be "non provisioning device" from Exchange server point of view. It basically means that it can
> not be managed from Exchange server - administrator can not wipe your device, request you to use autolock and so on.
> Basically, all the provisioning data received from the server is ignored and the server is informed that N900 MfE
> does not support this feature. Exchange administrator can configure the server in two ways - he/she can allow to use
> non-provisioning devices or disallow. In the second case N900 MfE will not work as server will reject the
> connection.

I used the new released z-push-1.3

first I test "loose_provisioning" -> does not work
Then I changed provisioning to false -> does not work

Then I update 1.2.3_RC to 1.2.3 -> works

Is not there another fundamental change between 1.2.x and 1.3:
For 1.2.x I have to patch diffbackend.php with this

+    function syncstate($state)
+    {
+        $this->_state=$state;
+    }

This was not necessary any longer when supporting 1.3 but something I would call "syncstate" is exactly my problem with 1.3 as every sync behaves like the first sync(?)

Bye

  Thorsten




More information about the users mailing list