Stupid(?) questions wrt Toltec
Henk van Lingen
henkvl at cs.uu.nl
Wed Mar 1 14:45:00 CET 2006
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:08:13PM +0100, Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
> >
> > And the pop3 issue (also see my "imap INBOX' question). I haven't used
> > pop for years now that we have imap, and I'm not enthousiastic about
> > the idea of going back to the situation where a delete on the (Outlook)
> > client isn't a delete on the mailserver and vice-versa. Am I missing
> > something?
>
> Outlook needs to fetch the mails via POP3, because in this case it
> executes some important code which it simply doesn't when fetching
> mails via IMAP. I don't remember the details, but I think this is
> related to parsing invitations.
>
> As soon as the mails are under Outlook's control, Toltec pushes them
> to the server via IMAP and from now on you can act on the mails in
> every way that IMAP supports.
Hi Thomas,
I dont think I understand this. Toltec pushes them to where on the
server? My server drops mail in INBOX. Outlook 2000 with Toltec however
looks in INBOX/Inbox, so it doesn't see new mail. Do I have to configure
something? I have 'leave mail on server', off course. Does Outlook 'see'
it when another imapclient removes a message, or is it supposed to copy
everything from INBOX to INBOX/Inbox ??
Or should I configure a new imap account? This option seems to be gone
after moving outlook to 'groupware mode'.
Should I upgrade to Outlook 2003?
Cheers,
--
Henk van Lingen, Systems & Network Administrator (o- -+
Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University. /\ |
phone: +31-30-2535278 v_/_
http://henk.vanlingen.net/ http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/
More information about the users
mailing list