Re: Kontact in KDE 3.3 vs in 3.4 [auf Viren überprüft]

[Hans Moser]

Martin Konold schrieb das Folgende am 27.05.2005 10:27:

>>We plan to go in production with SuSE 9.2, which is with KDE 3.3 by
>>default.
> If you depend on KDE 3.3 than it is definitely best to go with the Proko2 
> branch which got most quality assurance and was the target for our customer.
> 
> The Proko2 branch was developed with KDE 3.3 not 3.4.
> 
> Kontact in KDE 3.4.1 shall also be fine but got less testing.
I don't depend on KDE 3.3, I depend on what is delivered with Suse 9.2. 
(May be the same or not...)
Either I "take what I get" with Suse 9.2 or I take "something else". So, 
if Proko2 is *not* in Suse 9.2, using it, makes not even less difference 
than using KDE 3.4 (compared to the Suse 9.2-KDE version)!?
If not:
To archieve best compatibility - going out from Suse 9.2 - do I have to 
compile KDE as whole to get the Proko2 branch in or just KMail, 
KOrganizer etc.?
[Which could be a advantage against using KDE 3.4.; I haven't get in 
touch with KDE dev. since now, sorry!]


Hans