Kontact in KDE 3.3 vs in 3.4 [auf Viren überprüft]

[Andreas Gungl]

Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2005 14:39 schrieb Hans Moser:
> Martin Konold schrieb das Folgende am 27.05.2005 10:27:
> >>We plan to go in production with SuSE 9.2, which is with KDE 3.3 by
> >>default.
> >
> > If you depend on KDE 3.3 than it is definitely best to go with the
> > Proko2 branch which got most quality assurance and was the target for
> > our customer.
> >
> > The Proko2 branch was developed with KDE 3.3 not 3.4.
> >
> > Kontact in KDE 3.4.1 shall also be fine but got less testing.
>
> I don't depend on KDE 3.3, I depend on what is delivered with Suse 9.2.
> (May be the same or not...)
> Either I "take what I get" with Suse 9.2 or I take "something else".

To benefit from the effort Suse is putting into their RPMs, try to get your 
packages for Suse 9.2 from here
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_9.2/
(or simply configure YaST to bring your Suse 9.2 KDE RPMs up-to-date).

Regards,
Andreas