Kontact in KDE 3.3 vs in 3.4 [auf Viren überprüft]

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed May 25 19:22:02 CEST 2005


On Tuesday 24 May 2005 11:18, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Montag, 23. Mai 2005 15:33 schrieb Andreas Gungl:

> > > We plan to go in production with SuSE 9.2, which is with KDE 3.3 by
> > > default. There is 3.4 for 9.2, but it's noch that much supported by
> > > SuSE
> >
> > Kolab 2. (You might want to use the proko2 branch of kdepim, but there
> > you won't get support from the distributors either.)
>
> The proko2 branch is based on KDE 3.3 and comes with full quality assurance
> testing and support from the  (commercial) Kolab Konsortium.

We recomment proko2 branch on KDE 3.3 and to buy access to support, 
if you want to run this for production in larger settings.

> On the other hand I highly recommend to either use kontact from the 3.4
> branch or the upcoming 3.4.1 but not 3.4(.0).

This is if you want to help with ironing out the bugs as we do not know
of any distribution that offers support for Kolab funcationality.

Best,
Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050525/00cd4e5c/attachment.p7s>


More information about the users mailing list