RFC: KEP3: Introduction of 'subevent' sub-tag for 'exclusion' from 'recurrence' (revision #10661)
Georg C. F. Greve
greve at kolabsys.com
Mon Dec 6 21:29:34 CET 2010
Hi Alain,
On Monday 06 December 2010 20.54:08 Alain Abbas wrote:
> i think me must have a tag deleted and a tag exceptionstartime or keep
> the start-time in case of the exception is a deletion :
I am not quite sure whether I understood your suggestion correctly.
Currently, the proposal says that an exclusion without a subevent is a
deletion. If it contains a subevent, that subevent contains only the difference
towards the main even, all fields that are not specified remain unchanged.
Your proposal seems to be thinking of simultaneously changing a recurrence
exception and deleting it. This does not seem to make sense to me right now,
as deletion would also delete the changes.
So I must have misunderstood the idea.
Could you try to explain in more detail what you had in mind?
Best regards,
Georg
--
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer
Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland
e: greve at kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com
pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20101206/37e98bbd/attachment.sig>
More information about the format
mailing list