RFC: KEP3: Introduction of 'subevent' sub-tag for 'exclusion' from 'recurrence' (revision #10661)

Georg C. F. Greve greve at kolabsys.com
Mon Dec 6 21:29:34 CET 2010

Hi Alain,

On Monday 06 December 2010 20.54:08 Alain Abbas wrote:
> i think me must have a tag deleted and a tag exceptionstartime or keep 
> the start-time in case of the exception is a deletion :

I am not quite sure whether I understood your suggestion correctly.

Currently, the proposal says that an exclusion without a subevent is a 
deletion. If it contains a subevent, that subevent contains only the difference 
towards the main even, all fields that are not specified remain unchanged.

Your proposal seems to be thinking of simultaneously changing a recurrence 
exception and deleting it. This does not seem to make sense to me right now, 
as deletion would also delete the changes.

So I must have misunderstood the idea.

Could you try to explain in more detail what you had in mind?

Best regards,

Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer

Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland

e: greve at kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20101206/37e98bbd/attachment.sig>

More information about the format mailing list