[Kolab-devel] CalDAV Collections vs. IMAP Folders
Georg C. F. Greve
greve at kolabsys.com
Thu Mar 28 09:18:29 CET 2013
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 17.57:12 Thomas Brüderli wrote:
> Beside the semantics that don't really fit, it does.
Alright. In that case I think it makes sense to start here.
> Should we even consider to create a KEP for this? Reading through the
> discussion in this thread this shall become the generic display name for
> all clients and not only for *DAV. Otherwise different clients show
> different names for the same folder and I don't think this is desirable.
Agreed.
Best regards,
Georg
--
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer
Kolab Systems AG Make it your Kolab @ http://mykolab.com
Zürich, Switzerland or try it out at http://kolabsys.com/try
e: greve at kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com
pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130328/a04443c0/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list