[Kolab-devel] CalDAV Collections vs. IMAP Folders

Georg C. F. Greve greve at kolabsys.com
Thu Mar 28 09:18:29 CET 2013


On Wednesday 27 March 2013 17.57:12 Thomas Brüderli wrote:
> Beside the semantics that don't really fit, it does.

Alright. In that case I think it makes sense to start here.


> Should we even consider to create a KEP for this? Reading through the
> discussion in this thread this shall become the generic display name for
> all clients and not only for *DAV. Otherwise different clients show
> different names for the same folder and I don't think this is desirable.

Agreed.

Best regards,
Georg


-- 
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer

Kolab Systems AG				Make it your Kolab @ http://mykolab.com
Zürich, Switzerland				or try it out at http://kolabsys.com/try

e: greve at kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130328/a04443c0/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list