[Kolab-devel] MIME invitations?

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Saturday 20 November 2004 11:20, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 19 November 2004 19:28, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > On Friday 19 November 2004 18:25, Till Adam wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 November 2004 17:54, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > > > On Friday 19 November 2004 15:00, Till Adam wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 19 November 2004 14:43, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > > > > > I unchecked sending emails in the body and still send them in the
> > > > > > body.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :/ Does this feature still work?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this about invitations or replies? Because replies are always
> > > > > sent in the body no matter what, and have always been. Invitations
> > > > > are subject to the config switch, though.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, then I get it.
> > > > It was about replies.
> > > >
> > > > So that means I cannot reply encrypted. ;-)
> > > > Why not?
> > >
> > > I don't know, to be honest. The decision to always reply in the body
> > > was made before my time and I can only assume it was because of OL
> > > compatability requirements. Neither OL nor Kontact can handle signed or
> > > encrypted replies at this point, as far as I can tell. As I said,
> > > invitations are a different matter.
> >
> > Why is that that Kontact cannot handle it?
>
> I don't know, but what's the point in supporting it in kontact, if OL
> doesn't support it (and can't be fixed to support it, since AFAIK this
> isn't handled by the connector)?

Trying to remember I think that OL can handle it, but with extra clicks.
(I am not sure right now and obviously I cannot create such a thing within minute
with Kontact now.)
This is why we do not want it in the default case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041122/07094a99/attachment.p7s>