[Kolab-devel] MIME invitations?

[Bo Thorsen]

On Saturday 20 November 2004 11:20, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 19 November 2004 19:28, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > On Friday 19 November 2004 18:25, Till Adam wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 November 2004 17:54, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > > > On Friday 19 November 2004 15:00, Till Adam wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 19 November 2004 14:43, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > > > > > I unchecked sending emails in the body and still send them in
> > > > > > the body.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :/ Does this feature still work?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this about invitations or replies? Because replies are
> > > > > always sent in the body no matter what, and have always been.
> > > > > Invitations are subject to the config switch, though.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, then I get it.
> > > > It was about replies.
> > > >
> > > > So that means I cannot reply encrypted. ;-)
> > > > Why not?
> > >
> > > I don't know, to be honest. The decision to always reply in the
> > > body was made before my time and I can only assume it was because
> > > of OL compatability requirements. Neither OL nor Kontact can handle
> > > signed or encrypted replies at this point, as far as I can tell. As
> > > I said, invitations are a different matter.
> >
> > Why is that that Kontact cannot handle it?
>
> I don't know,

Me neither.

> but what's the point in supporting it in kontact, if OL 
> doesn't support it (and can't be fixed to support it, since AFAIK this
> isn't handled by the connector)?

It would still make sense for Kontact only environments, if we could have 
encrypted/signed mail scheduling.

Bo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041122/f53961b3/attachment.sig>