kalob3: BATV format?

[Kolab Users]

Hi Joh, 

IMHO BATV's major problem is that it doesn't play well
with greylisting systems. Since there's so many greylisting systems out
on the internet, that means implementing it may just cause unnecessary
delays in emails, for little gain. 

IMHO recipient-checks (backscatter
milters like scam-back, etc) handle this problem well enough. 

Please
read here for more information:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation [1] 

On
2013-02-18 20:48, Johannes Graumann wrote: 

> Hello,
> 
> I have been
testing a kolab3/Debian wheezy set up using 
>
http://www.allaboutspam.com/email-server-testOne of the comments that
comes back is:
> 
>> Email server is not using BATV format while sending
out emails. BATV is recommended to ensure that your users do not become
a victim of bounce floods.
> 
> To the experienced admins here: is this
worth implementing? And if so: what 
> might an implementation
(preferably on Debian) look like and consist from?
> 
> Thanks for your
input.
> 
> Sincerely, Joh
> 
>
_______________________________________________
> Kolab-users mailing
list
> Kolab-users at kolab.org
>
https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-users

--

Thanks,

Michael.
 

Links:
------
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130219/d5bcf293/attachment.html>