personal opinion.....
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Fri Oct 28 22:18:51 CEST 2005
Am Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 21:36 schrieb Joe Auty:
Hi Joe,
> > How do you want to keep the coherent management infrastructure
> > (kolabd) with
> > e.g. a SUSE Apache?
> >
> > The problem is that SUSE admins expect that YaST handles the
> > Apache, imapd,...
> > configuration not kolab....
>
> Well, are there technical issues with mixing and matching user
> installed parts with Kolab (i.e. Kolab requiring specific versions),
Yes, Kolab requires enhanced versions (some patches and versions are required)
> or are they issues of management,
management is a big issue. E.g. when a user is added to Kolab several
configuration files need to be modified and a cyrus imapd mailbox created
etc.
> installation, and organization?
Installation and organization are very minor issues.
BTW I still fail to understand why using the server componentes e.g. from RH
etc. is considered a big advantage. What is the big problem in
installing/upgrading/maintaining an OpenPKG rpm compared to a RH or SUSE rpm?
Regards,
-- martin
--
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the users
mailing list