Proko2 is Good News Towards Kolab2

[Jon Bendtsen]

Den 14. apr 2004, kl. 13:11, skrev Bo Thorsen:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 14 April 2004 08:48, Ivaylo Toshev wrote:
>> True. but againt: I mean totally different approach of storage - not 
>> in
>> client but on server. I know that this is totally different technical
>> conception compared with current kolab, but if this is some kind new
>> project, i thought that considering this option will not be just waste
>> of time.
>
> Well, no one will stop you from doing that of course. But the Kolab
> concept in this part is so basic that it's next to impossible to 
> change.
> We chose an IMAP based solution from day 1 with this project, back more
> than two years ago.
>
> Now, if you don't want to replicate locally, why not just use the
> non-storing mode of KMail IMAP? Or use POP3 to remove the mails from 
> the
> server? By not using a database, options like these are available too.

yes i know. What i was looking for was perhaps a choice of using Maildir
based IMAP as kolab does now? or using a DB based IMAP.



JonB