Proko2 is Good News Towards Kolab2

[Bo Thorsen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 14 April 2004 08:48, Ivaylo Toshev wrote:
> True. but againt: I mean totally different approach of storage - not in
> client but on server. I know that this is totally different technical
> conception compared with current kolab, but if this is some kind new
> project, i thought that considering this option will not be just waste
> of time.

Well, no one will stop you from doing that of course. But the Kolab 
concept in this part is so basic that it's next to impossible to change. 
We chose an IMAP based solution from day 1 with this project, back more 
than two years ago.

Now, if you don't want to replicate locally, why not just use the 
non-storing mode of KMail IMAP? Or use POP3 to remove the mails from the 
server? By not using a database, options like these are available too.

Bo.

- -- 

     Bo Thorsen                 |   Praestevejen 4
     Senior Software Engineer   |   5290 Marslev
     Klarälvdalens Datakonsult  |   Denmark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAfRxrmT99lwfUS5IRAuNUAKDNj+pFJEmWXyMtXrXbXGeEQAF/QwCfUZos
owvFhjo9aJpSHbcQtspJ8V0=
=F1p1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----