priority specification bug

Martin Konold martin.konold at
Thu Feb 23 20:28:15 CET 2006

Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 18:37 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:


> No, it was done on purpose as I darkly remember
> (with you also being part of the discussion group.)
> The reason as I remember it were that the user actually would not want
> to have too many priorities and with 1 to 5 a good mapping between
> Kolab (which onyl does 1 to 5) and outlook is done.
> I would ask back why KO changed back to 1-9 in non-kolab branches.

In short we have two standards. The MS Outlook industrie standard and the 

I definetly consider to invent a third standard a bug especially because we 
explicitly want interoperability.

-- martin

Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker

More information about the format mailing list