priority specification bug
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Thu Feb 23 20:28:15 CET 2006
Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 18:37 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> No, it was done on purpose as I darkly remember
> (with you also being part of the discussion group.)
> The reason as I remember it were that the user actually would not want
> to have too many priorities and with 1 to 5 a good mapping between
> Kolab (which onyl does 1 to 5) and outlook is done.
> I would ask back why KO changed back to 1-9 in non-kolab branches.
In short we have two standards. The MS Outlook industrie standard and the
I definetly consider to invent a third standard a bug especially because we
explicitly want interoperability.
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the format