private groupware objects

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at
Wed Aug 16 08:47:13 CEST 2006

Hi Martin,

On Tuesday 15 August 2006 20:53, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 13:49 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:

> > can you explain in more detail why the suggestions of
> >
> > are not feasable?
> > Those are the best I have seen so far.
> Sofar for more than half a year nobody was willing to implement it.

true, but this can have several possible reasons.

> When looking closer at the recurrance problem I discovered that we can
> solve the recurrance problem and the private object issue in a single
> swoop.

I'll reply to the recurrence and encryption issues in the other thread.

> > Martin,
> > we also have recieved no answer from Konsec about the proposal.
> > Johannes wrote before that he could think of that, but did not follow
> > up on the post I have linked above. Maybe you can also ask them?
> AFAIK Johannes is subscribed to this list. Last time I talk to him on
> the phone he told me that he is going to implement anything which we
> define as long as it is technically feasable. Actually he was waiting
> for a resolution for some significant time.

In February I specifically asked him if the proposal was technically 
feasable from his side and got no reply.


More information about the format mailing list