private groupware objects
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Tue Aug 15 20:53:20 CEST 2006
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 13:49 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> can you explain in more detail why the suggestions of
> are not feasable?
> Those are the best I have seen so far.
Sofar for more than half a year nobody was willing to implement it. When
looking closer at the recurrance problem I discovered that we can solve the
recurrance problem and the private object issue in a single swoop.
To leverage this fact is imho better than to implement a separate solution for
privacy and the recurrance problem. In addition the new proposal is more
flexible and allows to use security devices like smartcards.
> we also have recieved no answer from Konsec about the proposal.
> Johannes wrote before that he could think of that, but did not follow up
> on the post I have linked above. Maybe you can also ask them?
AFAIK Johannes is subscribed to this list. Last time I talk to him on the
phone he told me that he is going to implement anything which we define as
long as it is technically feasable. Actually he was waiting for a resolution
for some significant time.
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the format