Fwd: RE: recurrences counted from the back

[Martin Konold]

Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 02:26 schrieb Jesse Mundis:

Hi Jesse,

> This is less than ideal, as we lose any sense of relationship
> between the original event, and the location-changed instance.

If you reread my proposal you will see that the "second" event is in the very 
same xml document. The xml document describes that these two pieces of 
information belong together. So I am wondering what we would gain with 
the "RECURRENCE-ID"?

Actually my proposal was exactly modelled after the use case you just 
mentioned.

Q: So are both solution equivalent?

A: The RECURRENCE-ID works well for helping to describe complicated 
recurrances but my event-list proposal does not only solve the mose 
complicated recurrances but also solved the issue of private objects.

Regards,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker