Extra Header field

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Tue Jul 13 12:35:22 CEST 2004

On Monday 12 July 2004 19:09, David Faure wrote:

> But I suppose efficiency of one client is more important than
> "nice-looking folder list in KMail when the groupware folders are not
> hidden" (after all they are hidden by default, so the Subject doesn't
> matter much).

Wether to hide them or not is not completely a format question.
I suspect that we need to unhide them for usability reasons rather soon
by default.

> I'm fine with Subject == uid then, if nobody objects to it.

Hmmm, I don't know.
Those requirements tend to stick for a very long time
and it looks like another point where information is doubled.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20040713/3c557bc3/attachment.p7s>

More information about the format mailing list