Extra Header field

Martin Konold martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Mon Jul 12 22:29:20 CEST 2004

Am Montag, 12. Juli 2004 18:09 schrieb Joon Radley:


> In most cases (90%+) the header will be missing (RFC2822), but because the
> header is optional in the other 10%, efficiency will be lost as I will have
> to parse every message anyway.
> By making it the law you can look at the header and decide upfront how to
> handle it without parsing the whole mail. Is this not more efficient?

It seems we are looking at different cases. I was assuming groupware folders 
not general mail folders like the trash folder. IMHO I currently fail to 
understand why the contents of the trash folder needs to be parsed anyway.

-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold

e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: martin.konold at erfrakon.de

More information about the format mailing list