Extra Header field
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Mon Jul 12 22:29:20 CEST 2004
Am Montag, 12. Juli 2004 18:09 schrieb Joon Radley:
Hi,
> In most cases (90%+) the header will be missing (RFC2822), but because the
> header is optional in the other 10%, efficiency will be lost as I will have
> to parse every message anyway.
>
> By making it the law you can look at the header and decide upfront how to
> handle it without parsing the whole mail. Is this not more efficient?
It seems we are looking at different cases. I was assuming groupware folders
not general mail folders like the trash folder. IMHO I currently fail to
understand why the contents of the trash folder needs to be parsed anyway.
Yours,
-- martin
Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: martin.konold at erfrakon.de
More information about the format
mailing list