[Kolab-devel] Kolab 16 for Debian
Daniel Hoffend
dh at dotlan.net
Thu Dec 1 00:19:11 CET 2016
Hi hede
thanks for your answer, but I was more concerned about Jereons Call to
get Kolab:16 for Debian tested and fixed. Therefore I was looking around
what has changed in the last half year.
In the end there hasn't changed much to be fair :-) Especially not the
laggy OBS :-) I really haven't missed it.
In the mean time I've already fixed couple packages in Kolab:16 and
Winterfell which are already pushed through and live. At least a default
Debian Installation should now go through without any major drawbacks.
But there's still some packages and components missing to be feature
complete compared to the Centos Release.
--
Regards
Daniel
On 2016-11-29 21:42, hede wrote:
> Am Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:30:37 +0100 schrieb Daniel Hoffend <dh at dotlan.net>:
>
> > What's the correct way to fix package bugs nowadays? Send patch requests to kolab16 in obs or winterfell or both or what?
>
> Good question.
>
> AFAIK there are 2 ways:
>
> 1:
> - branch/fork the corresponding project/package in OBS[1]
> - fix errors in your personal home project
> - file a submit request to the upstream maintainer (within obs)
> - the package maintainer will hopefully include your work
>
> [1] https://obs.kolabsys.com/
>
> 2: Submit a patch in fabricator[2]
> - create a task
> - add your patch/diff to the task
> - the upstream developer will hopefully include your work
>
> [2] https://git.kolab.org/
>
> With way 1 you get your working packages in [3] (at least for AMD64). Incredibly handy for direct inclusion within some local kolab installation. With way 2 you'll better reach upstream developers.
>
> [3] http://obs.kolabsys.com:82/Kolab:/
>
> regards
> hede
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the devel
mailing list