[Kolab-devel] next patch, this time for kolab-webadmin and kolabd

[Bernhard Reiter]

Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2005 22:19 schrieb Martin Konold:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2005 11:37 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:

> > > I want to see the patches from Richard accepted _before_ going beta for
> > > 2.1.
> >
> > If the patches are fixing stuff, I am not against it.
>
> They are fixing long outstanding issues with hardcoding of paths which
> should be configurable. You know this very well, so no bickering about
> these patches please.

Where did you see me bickering about the patches?
Steffen committed all (but one or so) pending patches from Richard on tuesday 
or so, all the other big ones are in for a longer time.
so only a two or three newer smaller ones are waiting.

> > Steffen will most likly look at some stuff tomorrow.
>
> We are waiting for months for him to comment. 

His last comment about this waas on the 21th of November in personal email
that you an Richard have got.
Steffen asked to have the patches in the tracker and assigned to him,
and I agree that this is a good idea.
(Richard: Hint hint. ;) )

issue979 was created on the 10th of November, the patch later (commited
to the tracker on the 18th and put into CVS by Steffen on the 22nd, issue 
closed 23rd).

> As you know he did not have 
> the time. This fact shall not be used to dicriminate against the patches
> from Richard.

I am not discriminating against Richard's patches at all.
If we had done the beta before they would have created, they would not have 
been in also, so this does not pose a problem.
And we can only put in the patches that are on the table.

> > why not release a beta and then do another one,
> > instead of always waiting?
>
> The beta only makes sense when the biggest changes are already included.

The biggest and most important change was the simple email multidomain 
feature. Also we put in all the autoconfiscation patches, which were also 
big.

> The changes from Richard are touching many many files. There is some real
> risk that something is screwed up for some people though the fixes are
> expected to be trivial.

If all the patches would be here at a fixed date, we could plan for it.
Richard: Can you give a good date when all the big changes are done?

Bernhard