[Kolab-devel] universal inbox? outlook outgoing transport

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Tuesday 02 November 2004 16:40, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 November 2004 12:34, Steffen Hansen wrote:
> > How hard is it to get this integrated with the vacation and forwarding
> > sieve we do?
> > BTW: I have openend issue506 for this, so when we have a conclusion
> > we can register
> > it their and then you can implement it.
>
> The postfix approach seems to be okay.
You mean postfix moving the email? Because Steffen said that
postfix should mark it.
>  IMO only the admins will change
> this part of the system. But sieve is clearly on the user's side.
>
> I'm afraid this will be a source of problems considering that some people
> will try to handle the mail filtering on the server side using their own
> sieve scripts. This is the only way to avoid writing the same filter rule
> on multiple clients (e.g. desktop PC and notebook). To avoid this
> conflicts, they would have to care for those predefined sieve rules. Even
> if only power users will use sieve and given that there will be an
> appropriate user documentation available, I'm still in doubt about the
> approach.

If a users breaks the script, it will not hurt much.
It is needed only in the case that a multi-group account
shall be read by many OL users immedeately.
In this case vacation and forwarding will not be used normally.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041102/79cdf764/attachment.p7s>