Format clarification - folder annotations

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

On Friday, September 21, 2012 11:09:23 AM Aleksander Machniak wrote:
> I think that usage of word "namespace" is confusing. We have "IMAP
> namespaces" and "annotation namespaces". I propose to use word
> "namespace" only in context of IMAP folder hierarchy. When we talk about
> annotations I propose to use "private annotation", "shared annotation".
> 
> http://wiki.kolab.org/Kolab_3.0_Storage_Format#Annotations
> 

That is a good suggestion, but reading the RFC to see what terminology they 
use[1], perhaps "scope" is yet even better?

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5464#section-3.2

--
Systems Architect

Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland

e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
t: +41 43 501 66 91
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 0x9342BF08
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20120921/49f723ba/attachment.sig>