KEP 3: Introduction of 'subevent' sub-tag for 'exclusion' from 'recurrence'
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
Wed Nov 17 16:00:45 CET 2010
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:50:07 am Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> Hi all,
> Another decision that has been in the pipeline since 2007 was the question
> of handling exceptions from recurrence in ways that do not break the
> logical link between recurring events and their exceptions.
> The initial proposal for how to resolve this was still made by Martin
> Konold, and I think it makes sense, so I wrote it up for a KEP.
Do we want the subevent element to be a child of the exclusion for recurrence,
or do we want to consider these are not exclusions to the event perse, but
Either way the difference would be semantical, I suppose.
I would like to have documented which elements must or may be stored in within
subevent elements though;
- start date (obviously),
- duration or end-date (this may be a validly altering aspect of a recurrent
event as well),
Jeroen van Meeuwen
Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
t: +316 42 801 403
pgp: 9342 BF08
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the format