EPEL upgrade of Kolab roundcubemail?

[Cornelius Hald]

Thanks for the hint - it works!

Still, I find it odd that Kolabe chose to use the same package name for
roundcube. Are there any advantages in not naming it something like
kolab-roundcube?


On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:47 +0000, dsp3 wrote:
> You need to tell yum to prioritize Kolab repo over EPL repo.
> 
> On 19/03/15 14:45, Cornelius Hald wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > for some time now I have a pending update of 'roundcubemail'. It always
> > looked odd because it wanted to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.1.0.
> > 
> > So today I've looked at it closer and it seems like yum wants to install
> > the vanilla roundcube version from EPEL and replace the Kolab roundcube
> > version by doing so.
> > 
> > Shouldn't the Kolab version of Roundcube get a different name like
> > kolab-roundcube to prevent something like this?
> > 
> > Or do I misunderstand something? Here is the output of "yum info
> > roundcubemail".
> > 
> > Installed Packages
> > Name        : roundcubemail
> > Arch        : noarch
> > Version     : 1.1
> > Release     : 20.9.el7.kolab_3.3
> > Size        : 14 M
> > Repo        : installed
> >>From repo   : Kolab_3.3_Updates
> > [...]
> > 
> > Available Packages
> > Name        : roundcubemail
> > Arch        : noarch
> > Version     : 1.1.0
> > Release     : 1.el7
> > Size        : 2.8 M
> > Repo        : epel/x86_64
> > [...]
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Conny
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.kolab.org
> > https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users