Outlook connector - stability, pricing?

[Russell Hay]

Timotheus - thanks that's great news. I'll give Kolab a spin on my spangly
new server now to get used to it - then will watch out for the Copenhagen
features when they make it into a release.

Russ.

On 16 July 2015 at 11:19, Timotheus Pokorra <timotheus at kolab.org> wrote:

> Hello Russell,
>
> watch out for OpenChange integration (code name copenhagen), which was
> announced at the Kolab Summit at the beginning of May 2015.
> That should be the best solution: no connector required!
> see for details: https://git.kolab.org/T94
>
> Timotheus
>
> On 16 July 2015 at 11:53, Russell Hay <russellh at ysmail.net> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > just looking at a new mailserver - currently we've been on Scalix for a
> > number of years. I'll demo the server locally - but in advance - as this
> is
> > primarily a Windows shop, what's the stability like of the outlook
> > connectors? I appreciate I can just use IMAP without them - but last
> time I
> > used plain IMAP in Outlook (probably outlook 2003) - it behaved really
> badly
> > in comparison to  a 'proper' IMAP client (e.g. Thunderbird)
> >
> > I see there are a few proprietary ones listed - are they required,
> current,
> > maintained - any recommendations?
> >
> > Thx in advance,
> >
> > Russ.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.kolab.org
> > https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150716/c957b049/attachment.html>