saslauthd missing httpform

[Thomas Spuhler]

On Monday, April 13, 2015 01:30:30 PM Fisher, Mike wrote:
> We are running Kolab 2.4 on CentOS 5.11 I recompiled cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 with
> 
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc  --with-dbpath=/var/lib/sasl/sasldb2
> --with-saslauthd=/var/run/saslauthd --enable-httpform --with-des=no
> 
> And it seems to work great now.
> 
> The standard package doesn't seem to be compiled with support for httpform in it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.kolab.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.kolab.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
> Grote Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 8:43 PM
> To: users at lists.kolab.org
> Subject: Re: saslauthd missing httpform
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> what version of Kolab are you running on which platform?
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Torsten
> 
> On Thursday 09 April 2015 21:06:08 Fisher, Mike wrote:
> > Anyone have any advice on  how to get saslauthd to support httpform?
> > 
> > Good one:
> > saslauthd 2.1.22
> > authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap
> > httpform
> > 
> > 
> > Bad one:
> > saslauthd 2.1.22
> > authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap
> > 
> > Do I have to compile it with that feature or is there a package
> > available already?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> --
> Torsten Grote
> Kolab.org Community Manager
> 
> e: torsten at kolab.org
> w: https://Kolab.org
> 
> pgp: 0x2175A534A4F2EFA3
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings Corporation and/or one
> of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it without reading the
> contents. Thank you. _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Good to know. Seem fedora added it in 2012.
What is the disadvantage of adding httpform?
I could add it next release cycle in Mageia.

-- 
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler

All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150413/241210d7/attachment.sig>