Kolab with database IMAP server

[Mateusz Kijowski]

I guess that Dovecot's FTS plugins [1] would enable searching at least as
fast as a DBMS based solution. Just my 0,02 PLN ;-)


[1] http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS


2014/1/22 Sebastian Schlatow <buzz-dee at riseup.net>

>  Am 22.01.2014 11:25, schrieb Torsten Grote:
>
>  Hi Sebastian,
>
> although you have not said it explicitly, I got the impression that the reason
> why you want to use DBMail is because you think that it provides better
> performance compared to file based IMAP servers.
>
> Is that impression correct and if so, do you have evidence supporting this?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Torsten
>
> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 11:19:12 Sebastian Schlatow wrote:
>
>  IMAP ACL http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/shared-mbox and LDAPhttp://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/ldap_authentication is supported by
> DBMail as far as I can see.
>
>   Hi Torsten,
>
> your impression is correct, but I don't know if it corresponds to the
> reality. I found a thread, where Dovecut is faster than DBMail.
>
>    -
>    https://serverfault.com/questions/57833/fast-imap-server-for-larger-folders/
>    - http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022599.html
>
> Also, it seems that the client is the bottleneck for searching 2 million
> mails in an IMAP shared folder. How could it be possible to do that in a
> fast way?
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.kolab.org
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140123/b204e58e/attachment.html>