64-bit kolab?
Gavin McCullagh
gavin.mccullagh at gcd.ie
Thu Jan 21 17:56:12 CET 2010
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 15:31:22 schrieb Gavin McCullagh:
> > 1. Keep maintenance as simple as possible (I may not always be the
> > maintainer). Security patches involving download, compile and install
> > is not the simplest route.
> > 2. Keep as closely as possible to the kolab user norms so that if I or
> > someone else ask the mailing list for help down the road, the problems
> > I'm seeing are most likely something someone else has seen.
>
> The Kolab Server recommended way is to use OpenPKG packages source compiled.
> The 32bit binary packages are a very specific convenience solution (and might
> not even work best on different 32bit machines).
Ah. That changes matters a bit.
> Security patching in source usually is quite simple. If you fear larger
> interruptions you would use your staging system (for all major IT systems it
> is good to have a staging system.) and then use the resulting personal
> binaries.
Fair enough. I'll take a look and make sure it's well documented here.
> As far as I remember the 64 advantages are minimal in the regular case.
That's what I would imagine alright.
Thanks,
Gavin
More information about the users
mailing list