User Deleted, awaiting cleanup... Problem
Thomas Spuhler
thomas at btspuhler.com
Mon Jun 29 06:27:04 CEST 2009
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 02:53:38 Liutauras Adomaitis wrote:
> Hi kolab users,
>
> I'm using kolab2.2.2 and having problems with deleting users - <Subj.>
> I have read wiki and etc, which are saying, that there are two possible
> causes: - kolabd is not working
> My box:
> # [root at PBL-kolab user]# /kolab/bin/openpkg rc kolabd status
> OpenPKG: status: kolabd.
> kolabd_enable="yes"
> kolabd_usable="unknown"
> kolabd_active="yes"
> # [root at PBL-kolab user]# ps aux | grep kolabd
> root 5929 3.4 0.5 13356 11640 pts/2 S 12:48 0:00
> /kolab/bin/perl /kolab/sbin/kolabd
> root 5933 0.0 0.5 13356 10560 pts/2 S 12:48 0:00
> /kolab/bin/perl /kolab/sbin/kolabd
> root 6009 0.0 0.0 1988 544 pts/2 S+ 12:48 0:00 grep
> --color kolabd
>
> - Delete /kolab/var/kolab/mailbox-uidcache.db file and restart kolabd -
> done.
>
> I also find some posts mentioning OpenLDAP SLURP replication could
> cause this behavior if slave is not found.
>
> My question:
> Do I have to disable ldap replication manually and how. I see there is
> a slurpd process is running and there repalica configurations in
> slapd.conf and slapd.replica files.
>
> Thanks
> Liutauras
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kolab-users mailing list
> Kolab-users at kolab.org
> https://kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/kolab-users
I did some more research an increased debug and log level.
The kolabd doesn't like in /kolab.globals
directory_mode : @directory_mode@
i SEE IN THE SYSLOG:
Jun 28 21:25:35 aargau kolabd: K: Loading backends
Jun 28 21:25:35 aargau kolabd: B: Loading backend `@directory_mode@'
Jun 28 21:25:35 aargau kolabd: B Error: Error is: syntax error at (eval 70)
line 1, near "require Kolab::LDAP::Backend::@directory_mode" Global symbol
"@directory_mode" requires explicit package name at (eval 70) line 1, <DATA>
line 516.
Jun 28 21:25:35 aargau kolabd: B Error: Backend `@directory_mode@' does not
exist or has errors, exiting
Since slurp is gone this should be the way for replication. But what could be
wrong?
--
Thomas
More information about the users
mailing list