[Kolab-devel] Closing Call: KEP #9

Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
Mon Sep 5 14:56:33 CEST 2011

Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2011 13.23:53 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> > We are currently shipping a file in which, apparently, some entries have
> > little to no rationale, its purpose may be unknown, with namespaces added
> > that do not have an owner, lacking the necessary documentation, and some
> > of which the probable owners fail to see the continued use.
> Yes, that is a very valid point of concern.
> > Seriously though, if not the KEP process, can we require somebody takes
> > ownership of every annotation shipped, and document it's purpose to say
> > the very least?
> Why not require taking ownership of such an annotation by means of a KEP
> that actually documents what this is, does, and how it is used?

That's what I think I suggested in the first place.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG

e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
t: +44 144 340 9500
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://www.kolabsys.com

pgp: 9342 BF08
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20110905/3ec81283/attachment.html>

More information about the format mailing list