Why and when storing local time? (Re: Basic rationale of the KEP #2 design)

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Mar 31 17:42:41 CEST 2011


Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2011 12:11:26 schrieb Florian v. Samson:
> TZ changes in the categories 1 and 2 are effectively irrelevant IMO, and
> even for those belonging to category 3 some drawbacks might be acceptable.

as far I can tell you can solve 2 and 3 only together.

Please show me where I am wrong on the three examples of

> P.S.: I do agree with the remainder of Jeroen's email just as much as I did
> with the start of it:

I have put forth several arguments in replies to Jeroen's post,
which neither you or he responded to yet. Does your agreement mean
that you still agree to what he wrote after reading my arguments,
then my questions are also addressed to you.

Managing Director - Owner: www.intevation.net       (Free Software Company)
Deputy Coordinator Germany: fsfe.org. Board member: www.kolabsys.com.
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20110331/b4d0f2dc/attachment.sig>

More information about the format mailing list