Timezone issues
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Tue Jun 3 16:49:33 CEST 2008
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
>> I tend to disagree with this statement. IMHO the location Berlin is always
>> GMT+1 independent of DST. In general DST does NOT affect the timezone. The
>> later is only affected by the location.
> Common explanations tend to differ from your view:
>
I guess that this is due to some language inaccuracies.
> We would need to change the datetime definition then to include timezone
> information and we would need to come up with a good definition for timezone.
> As this forces a massive change on all clients, I believe we should propose
> something for beyond the 2.0 spec, which is stable as it is (and having the
> shortcomings that is has).
>
I don't see the massive change as current clients seem not to really
care or implement smart/correct timezone and DST handling.
>> Why is a recurring event like weekly on Mondays at 2pm a rare use case?
>>
>
> Well, it is not. But people argued somehow that this was not happening
> due to calculations when the appointment was made.
>
So how is a reccuring event which happens daily at noon expressed in our
xml according to your view?
> I remembered testing this stuff Toltec and Kontact back and forth
> and it used to work.
>
Did you also cover events which got created before the DST change and
then looked at them after the DST change?
Yours,
-- martin
More information about the format
mailing list