How compatible should clients be?

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Tuesday 06 November 2007 15:38, Gunnar Wrobel wrote:
> > Of course I am all for experiments if somebody likes to do them.
> > It is not necessary to hand out the Kolab compatible label for this,
> > though.
>
> That is all I'm asking for. The possibility to experiment. As long as
> I'm free to declare new folder types and new data types stored in XML
> I'm happy :) No need to brand them with "Kolab" at all.

No one keeps you from doing to for experiments of course.
I suggest that you keep an option to enable and disable those experiments
in a client.

-- 
Managing Director - Owner: www.intevation.net       (Free Software Company)
Germany Coordinator: fsfeurope.org. Coordinator: www.Kolab-Konsortium.com.
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20071106/dfae44f6/attachment.sig>