private groupware objects

Martin Konold martin.konold at
Wed Sep 6 11:04:56 CEST 2006

Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 12:27 schrieb Joon Radley:


> > can you explain in more detail why the suggestions of
> >
> > are not feasable?

> It is the worse possible hack.

I agree, lets drop the original proposal using multiple server side objects 
for a single client side object.

IMHO using partly encrypted xml is the best proposal. Doing the security on 
the client for _private_ data is imho a good practice.

-- martin

Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker

More information about the format mailing list