private groupware objects

Martin Konold martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Wed Sep 6 11:04:56 CEST 2006


Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 12:27 schrieb Joon Radley:

Hi,

> > can you explain in more detail why the suggestions of
> > http://kolab.org/pipermail/kolab-format/2006-February/000649.html
> > are not feasable?

> It is the worse possible hack.

I agree, lets drop the original proposal using multiple server side objects 
for a single client side object.

IMHO using partly encrypted xml is the best proposal. Doing the security on 
the client for _private_ data is imho a good practice.

Regards,
-- martin

-- 
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker




More information about the format mailing list