private groupware objects
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Wed Sep 6 11:04:56 CEST 2006
Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 12:27 schrieb Joon Radley:
Hi,
> > can you explain in more detail why the suggestions of
> > http://kolab.org/pipermail/kolab-format/2006-February/000649.html
> > are not feasable?
> It is the worse possible hack.
I agree, lets drop the original proposal using multiple server side objects
for a single client side object.
IMHO using partly encrypted xml is the best proposal. Doing the security on
the client for _private_ data is imho a good practice.
Regards,
-- martin
--
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the format
mailing list