johannes.hirche at konsec.com
Tue Feb 28 11:26:53 CET 2006
> The possibility we propose is:
> p101) Save the priority as 10 values as RFC 2445 suggests:
> 0 = no priority selected
> 1-9 = priorities, with 1 being higest
> p102) The clients have a choice of how to display those ten values
> in principle. If a mapping is used towards low, middle, high,
> RFC2445 mapping must be used.
> We suggest to use the mapping of RFC 2445 for
> low, middle, high and "no selection" for all clients with
> "no-selection" displayed and sorted as "middle" it not possible
> p103) The clients shall preserve the saved value, even when
> using a different mapping for display, if the priority is not
> Joon, Till, Johannes:
> What do you think?
Fine with me, the only question which comes in mind is if (and if we do, how)
we should handle a migration of existing objects as we can't distinguish them.
More information about the format