bo at klaralvdalens-datakonsult.se
Wed Jun 30 08:47:30 CEST 2004
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 08:38, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2004 08:12 schrieb Stephan Buys:
> > Agreed. UTC is the one safe bet that we have. And with the least
> > amount of "what-ifs". Daylight-saving, etc, etc is controlled through
> > the timezones which are client-driven.
> Sorry, but this will simply not work. There is a fundamental semantic
> difference between time with explicit timezone and local times without
> The only thing I am asking for (last mail from me towards the timezone
> topic) is make the timezone (UTC) _explicit_ (using a Z) not implizit.
This makes sense to me. I don't see any reason not to do this now, since
it allows for future revisions of the format.
Let's just tag a Z at the end of datetime and move on. No change in
functionality is required for now.
Bo Thorsen | Praestevejen 4
Senior Software Engineer | 5290 Marslev
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult | Denmark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the format