Small extension to the annotate proposal
joon at radleys.co.za
Wed Jun 30 08:21:39 CEST 2004
> > > I really don't see the point why
> > >
> > > /vendor/kolab/folder-type event
> > > /vendor/kolab/storage-format xml 1.0
> > >
> > > should hurt?
> > Yes. So any "Kolab compliant" client can enter any format
> e.g. "vCard
> > 1.0"/"iCal 1.0"/"XYZ 1.0" into the storage format. It will create a
> > huge interoperability problem. This what we are trying to avoid.
> > XML, vCard, iCal, XYZ, what is the storage format that
> Kolab will be
> > using for the next three years?
> No, this is not about what Kolab uses but about making it
> explicit instead of implicit and allowing for future
> development without problems when upgrading.
> Explicit formats specifications are superior to implicit
> format specifications.
There is only one format, the Kolab Format as define in the XML
specification, or am I wrong about this?
Radley Network Technologies CC
Cell: +27 (0)83 368 8557
Fax: +27 (0)12 998 4346
E-mail: joon at radleys.co.za
More information about the format