Small extension to the annotate proposal

[Bo Thorsen]

On Tuesday 29 June 2004 10:43, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. Juni 2004 10:41 schrieb David Faure:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > To make the proposal more precise:
> > We currently have
> >  /vendor/kolab/folder-type where value.shared is set to mail, event,
> > journal, etc.
> >
> > I like the idea of adding
> >  /vendor/kolab/storage-format where value.shared would be "xml 1.0"
> > (referring to the kolab xml storage version 1.0". This would allow to
> > set it to 2.0 in case of major changes later, and it would also allow
> > values like "ical 1.0" or "vcard 1.0".
>
> This is exactly what I want.

As agreed later in this thread, versioning should not go into the 
annotation.

I also disagree that we should add format here. Instead, I would propose 
that whoever does annotations on other types of formats in these kolab 
folders just do something like /vendor/kolab/ical/calendar 
or /vendor/kolab/ical.calendar. That would mean they can do whatever they 
want.

The Kolab format specifies the format when the annotation 
is /vendor/kolab/calendar (for example). Other formats can just choose 
something else.

Bo.

-- 

     Bo Thorsen                 |   Praestevejen 4
     Senior Software Engineer   |   5290 Marslev
     Klarälvdalens Datakonsult  |   Denmark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20040629/59234529/attachment.sig>