A couple of additional suggestions

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Mon Aug 16 15:50:50 CEST 2004

On Monday 16 August 2004 14:20, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> On Monday 16 August 2004 14:12, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > On Monday 16 August 2004 13:42, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> > > I think we miss a very important tag: <revision>
> >
> > What would revision mean?
> > Is it about the format?
> No, it's revision of the incidence/note/... Whenever it's changed, it
> should += 1.

This can only work with comparisons and the imapid already
has that information.

The messages saved will have a higher imapid
and all messages with higher imapids to the old one (but the same eventid)
in the comparison will need to be considered for conflict resolution.
There is always room to get two of those on the server,
so no way to make revision a unique value.

So what would be the extra benefit of revision?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2143 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20040816/6efeea51/attachment.p7s>

More information about the format mailing list