[Kolab-devel] Bugzilla (Re: Native Packaging, Issue Tracking & Restructuring the SCM)

Christoph Wickert wickert at kolabsys.com
Wed Sep 15 23:10:05 CEST 2010


Sorry for the late response, but I was offline today due to traveling.

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:47:23 Bernhard Reiter wrote:

> can you give the rationale for changing the issue tracking system?

Because it offers many features that roundup does not and will not if you 
don't put a *significant* amount of work into it. And by "significant" I mean 
not the days that Sascha and Thomas have been working on roundup for the BSI 
recently but about *really* significant workload. Do you want to pay two of 
your best developers spending a month on roundup?

> I would like to see the alternative to fulfill the requirements
> with roundup. I have a strong preference against bugzilla.

Why?

I can give you 20 reasons why I consider roundup not useful. This is 
definitely something we will bring up next week and I hope we will have an 
open and constructive discussion about it.

Kind regards,
Christoph

-- 
Christoph Wickert
Senior Engineer

Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland

e: wickert at kolabsys.com
t: +49 251 871 369 77
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 85DACC63 Christoph Wickert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100915/a756806b/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list