[Kolab-devel] Bugzilla (Re: Native Packaging, Issue Tracking & Restructuring the SCM)
Christoph Wickert
wickert at kolabsys.com
Wed Sep 15 23:10:05 CEST 2010
Sorry for the late response, but I was offline today due to traveling.
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:47:23 Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> can you give the rationale for changing the issue tracking system?
Because it offers many features that roundup does not and will not if you
don't put a *significant* amount of work into it. And by "significant" I mean
not the days that Sascha and Thomas have been working on roundup for the BSI
recently but about *really* significant workload. Do you want to pay two of
your best developers spending a month on roundup?
> I would like to see the alternative to fulfill the requirements
> with roundup. I have a strong preference against bugzilla.
Why?
I can give you 20 reasons why I consider roundup not useful. This is
definitely something we will bring up next week and I hope we will have an
open and constructive discussion about it.
Kind regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Wickert
Senior Engineer
Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland
e: wickert at kolabsys.com
t: +49 251 871 369 77
w: http://kolabsys.com
pgp: 85DACC63 Christoph Wickert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100915/a756806b/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list