[Kolab-devel] bug in seperator and freebusy ?
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Fri Dec 12 09:59:40 CET 2008
Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2008 22:37:21 schrieb Richard Bos:
Hi Richard,
> I assume because at the moment it is possible to get a folder hierarchy for
> regular folders, like:
>
> folder-A
> folder-1
> folder-2
> folder-B
> folder-1
> etc
>
> But the shared folders are all shown in the folder-[AB] level not on
> folder-[12] level. Currently it is like this:
> folder-A
> folder-1
> folder-2
> folder-B
> folder-1
> shared.folder1
> shared.folder2
> ...
> shared.folder20
> I think that it would indeed be better that, like:
> folder-A
> folder-1
> folder-2
> folder-B
> folder-1
> shared
> folder
> folder2
> ...
> folder20
But folder-A and folder-B are below the INBOX namespace while folder1 is below
the shared Namespace. In your example
shared
folder1
folder2
---
folder20
would not be distinguishable from folders
INBOX/shared/folder1
INBOX/shared/folder2
....
Basically this means that it must be clear that these folders are not
subfolders of the users INBOX but that they are shared/public folders.
In general there are three namespaces in Kolab.
1. personal namespace
These are all folders which are located below the users INBOX
- shared folders
There are folders which are made available to other users and groups using
IMAP ACLs. This namespace is indicated by "user/"
- public folders
These are folders created by an administrator which do not belong to any user.
Unfortunately these public folders are announces using the keyword "shared".
Yours,
-- martin
--
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Sitz: Adolfstraße 23, 70469 Stuttgart, Partnerschaftsregister Stuttgart PR 126
http://www.erfrakon.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081212/407ffcea/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list