[Kolab-devel] kolab 2.2beta1: implicit ACL not effective

[Alain Spineux]

On 9/3/07, Alain Spineux <aspineux at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is not related to the domain name but to the DOT :-)
> This affect all cyrus version including 2.2.x, but 2.2.X let the user
> restore its rights by itself.

Ops sorry, filling out the bug report, I saw my mistake about 2.2.X.
The problem is identical with all 2.2.X
Regards

https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2987

>
> I opened an issue at cyrus bugzilla.
>
> REgards
>
> On 8/31/07, Alain Spineux <aspineux at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It looks like this depend of the domain.
> > I don't have the problem with the first domain registered in kolab
> >
> > Here fc6-eg.asxnet.loc is the firts one, mydomain.loc is the second one
> >
> > [root at fc6-eg kolab_src]# cyradm -u asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc --password
> > genesis localhost
> > localhost.localdomain> lam INBOX
> > asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc lrswipkxtecda
> > localhost.localdomain> sam INBOX asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc r
> > localhost.localdomain> lam INBOX
> > asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc lrkxca
> > localhost.localdomain> sam INBOX asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc lrswipkxtecda
> > localhost.localdomain> lam INBOX
> > asx at fc6-eg.asxnet.loc lrswipkxtecda
> > localhost.localdomain>
> > [root at fc6-eg kolab_src]# cyradm -u foo.bar at mydomain.loc --password
> > genesis localhost
> > localhost.localdomain> lam INBOX
> > foo.bar at mydomain.loc lrswipkxtecda
> > localhost.localdomain> sam INBOX foo.bar at mydomain.loc r
> > localhost.localdomain> lam INBOX
> > foo.bar at mydomain.loc r
> > localhost.localdomain> sam INBOX foo.bar at mydomain.loc lrswipkxtecda
> > setaclmailbox: foo.bar at mydomain.loc: lrswipkxtecda: Mailbox does not exist
> >
> > Can someone confirm please ?
> > any idea ?
> >
> > On 8/31/07, Alain Spineux <aspineux at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/31/07, Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> wrote:
> > > > On Friday 31 August 2007 12:47, Alain Spineux wrote:
> > > > > The issue is with kolab-2.2 not 2.1 sorry, can you test again with a 2.2
> > > >
> > > > I know you have had the issue with server 2.2b1,
> > > > I thought you wanted the test on 2.1.0 as you did not test this version.
> > > >
> > > > 8)
> > > >
> > > > (Now Gunnar did a test.)
> > > > If you are building fedora now, on which platform have you been
> > > > where it is not working?
> > >
> > > I'm building kolab-2.2beta1 on FC6 and centos-4.1
> > > I tested kolab-2.2beta1 on centos 5 and Fedora 7 and got failure.
> > > I tested native FC7 imapd-2.3.8 with success
> > >
> > > Most of these machine are Xen or VMware machines
> > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Kolab-devel mailing list
> > > > Kolab-devel at kolab.org
> > > > https://kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alain Spineux
> > > aspineux gmail com
> > > May the sources be with you
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alain Spineux
> > aspineux gmail com
> > May the sources be with you
> >
>
>
> --
> Alain Spineux
> aspineux gmail com
> May the sources be with you
>


-- 
Alain Spineux
aspineux gmail com
May the sources be with you