[Kolab-devel] Re: martin: doc/architecture freebusy.txt, 1.13, 1.14

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 21:13, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 20:40 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:

> IMHO the freebusy.txt is about the definition of an architecture not about
> educating people about why which decision has been taken.

Still we should place the reasoning somewhere.
Which place do you suggest instead?

> > > But on the other hand client side pfb makes sense somewhen in the
> > > future for privacy reasons.
> >
> > I think this was one of my motivations to have it in there.
> > If you agree that it makes sense in the future, why not add it again?
>
> Yeah adding it to freebusy.txt for future privacy reasoning is fine with
> me.

Done.

> In addition we will be able to use the upload feature for very complex
> distributed accounts. (E.g. for administrative or legal reasons it might be
> required that different pim folders including calendars must be stored in
> different administrative domains but still people might want to have a
> central fb service...

Yes, I think this is a variation of the privacy issue and tried to phrase
it neutrally enough to include it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050614/dab30ad0/attachment.p7s>