[Kolab-devel] Re: martin: doc/architecture freebusy.txt, 1.13, 1.14

[Bernhard Reiter]

Hi Martin,

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 20:03, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 18:02 schrieben Sie:

> > There was more in the commit, you deleted one future aspect.
> > What was the reason?
>
> Basically after some experiments I came to the conclusion that even with
> very large sites the overhead for the communication of the client generated
> pfb is larger than an optimized server side pfb generation. This overhead
> is increasing with larger folders to the disadvantage of the upload option.
> The server side code can be made O(1). While the communication overhead has
> a strong O(n) component.

an interesting finding.
This could be added to the text.

> But on the other hand client side pfb makes sense somewhen in the future
> for privacy reasons.

I think this was one of my motivations to have it in there.
If you agree that it makes sense in the future, why not add it again?

Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050614/94c5af12/attachment.p7s>