<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div><br>On 22 Jan 2014, at 10:37, Sebastian Schlatow <<a href="mailto:buzz-dee@riseup.net">buzz-dee@riseup.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Am 22.01.2014 11:25, schrieb Torsten Grote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:6827837.QykfraeFVp@t7laptop1" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Sebastian,
although you have not said it explicitly, I got the impression that the reason
why you want to use DBMail is because you think that it provides better
performance compared to file based IMAP servers.
Is that impression correct and if so, do you have evidence supporting this?
Kind Regards,
Torsten
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 11:19:12 Sebastian Schlatow wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">IMAP ACL <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/shared-mbox">http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/shared-mbox</a> and LDAP
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/ldap_authentication">http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/ldap_authentication</a> is supported by
DBMail as far as I can see.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""></pre>
</blockquote>
Hi Torsten,<br>
<br>
your impression is correct, but I don't know if it corresponds to
the reality. I found a thread, where Dovecut is faster than DBMail.<br>
<ul>
<li><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://serverfault.com/questions/57833/fast-imap-server-for-larger-folders/">https://serverfault.com/questions/57833/fast-imap-server-for-larger-folders/</a></li>
<li><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022599.html">http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022599.html</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Also, it seems that the client is the bottleneck for searching 2
million mails in an IMAP shared folder. How could it be possible
to do that in a fast way?<br>
</p>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>users mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:users@lists.kolab.org">users@lists.kolab.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users">https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></span></div></blockquote><br><div>Hi all, </div><div><br></div><div>I had a play with dbmail (horde was the web front end) and it did not play nicely with activesync. Regarding performance I think it will be slower as you are adding an extra layer between the data coming in and getting stored on the physical disk. </div><div><br></div><div>My $0.02 worth</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers PJ</div></body></html>