Kolab with database IMAP server

[Sebastian Schlatow]

Am 22.01.2014 11:25, schrieb Torsten Grote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> although you have not said it explicitly, I got the impression that the reason 
> why you want to use DBMail is because you think that it provides better 
> performance compared to file based IMAP servers.
>
> Is that impression correct and if so, do you have evidence supporting this?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Torsten
>
> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 11:19:12 Sebastian Schlatow wrote:
>> IMAP ACL http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/shared-mbox and LDAP
>> http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/ldap_authentication is supported by
>> DBMail as far as I can see.
Hi Torsten,

your impression is correct, but I don't know if it corresponds to the
reality. I found a thread, where Dovecut is faster than DBMail.

  * https://serverfault.com/questions/57833/fast-imap-server-for-larger-folders/
  * http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022599.html

Also, it seems that the client is the bottleneck for searching 2 million
mails in an IMAP shared folder. How could it be possible to do that in a
fast way?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140122/5c4dd96b/attachment.html>