IMAP direct

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Tue Mar 22 14:35:12 CET 2005


Hi Martin,

On Tuesday 22 March 2005 12:18, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. März 2005 11:02 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:

> > > Well, all of Kolab 2 internally relies of having a domain. (This was
> > > necessary as a preperation for future multi-domain support).
> > >
> > > Doing email without a domain is imho not really useful.
> >
> > Can you more specific about where it breaks and why?
> > I am probably missing something, but why shouldn't
> > one machine serving as its own domain work for test settings?
>
> Kolab requires to have an email domain. As an extreme the email domain may
> be identical to the FQDN but not the plain hostname.

So why not dc=max on the machine "max"?
It works below.
Of course email has to be fetched and delivered by a different way.

> We use the email domain (don't mix it with the internet domain) in multiple
> places inclunding the LDAP structure (dc components e.g dc=de, dc=erfrakon)
> and the cyrus imapd spool (e.g. /kolab/var/imapd/spool/domain/erfrakon.de)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050322/1a4aff68/attachment.p7s>


More information about the users mailing list