KEP 2: Modification of datetime type, introduction of 'tz' sub-tag
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
Thu Nov 18 23:14:21 CET 2010
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 08:56:06 pm Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 17:10:56 Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16.32:58 Hendrik Helwich wrote:
> > > Why not keep the established UTC time format like it is defined in the
> > > kolab specification? It holds all needed information and it would not
> > > be necessary to adapt the kolab specification on that point.
> > As you correctly pointed out, the specification is inconsistent in this
> > point.
> Which client and version did you test that gave the "+00:00" format
> (which I also believe is wrong according to the spec)?
> Note that Kontact Proko2 is the reference client and Kontact e35 is coming
> very close. Kontact from PIM 4.x something probably has more defects,
> so it will be less compatible.
FWIW, on Kontact 4.5, the only non-zulu datetime entries I see are the <last-
modification /> element contents -then again that doesn't say much does it?
Jeroen van Meeuwen
Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
t: +316 42 801 403
pgp: 9342 BF08
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the format