RFC: KEP3: Introduction of 'subevent' sub-tag for 'exclusion' from 'recurrence' (revision #10661)

[Georg C. F. Greve]

Hi Alain,

On Monday 06 December 2010 20.54:08 Alain Abbas wrote:
> i think me must have a tag deleted and a tag exceptionstartime or keep 
> the start-time in case of the exception is a deletion :

I am not quite sure whether I understood your suggestion correctly.

Currently, the proposal says that an exclusion without a subevent is a 
deletion. If it contains a subevent, that subevent contains only the difference 
towards the main even, all fields that are not specified remain unchanged.

Your proposal seems to be thinking of simultaneously changing a recurrence 
exception and deleting it. This does not seem to make sense to me right now, 
as deletion would also delete the changes.

So I must have misunderstood the idea.

Could you try to explain in more detail what you had in mind?

Best regards,
Georg


-- 
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer

Kolab Systems AG
Zürich, Switzerland

e: greve at kolabsys.com
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20101206/37e98bbd/attachment.sig>